Legal Opinion

In re Terry

New York County Courts

Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to confirm report of commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

This is a motion to confirm the report of the commissioners heretofore appointed in this proceeding, who found and decided that the proposed highway was not necessary and that the road proposed to he discontinued was not useless, and to dismiss the application.

Ho objection was made upon the return of this motion to the granting of an order confirming the report of the commissioners, which doubtless carries with it the allowance of and directions for the payment of costs and expenses of the commissioners, not exceeding $100.

Section 193 of the new Highway Law, approved February 17, 1909,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. In Matter, Etc., Waverly Water-Works Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. In re Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. In re PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Patton v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Idaho Dept. of Water Resources v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Idaho Dept. of Water Resources v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API