Legal Opinion
John v. Dinan Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
There being neither pleading nor proof of compliance by plaintiff with the provisions of the General Business Law (§§ 37-39-o; superseded by Education Law, §§ 1450, 1467, *455added by Laws of 1927, chap. 85), the recovery cannot be sustained. (Preiser v. Solomon, 170 N. Y. Supp. 307.)
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Bijur and Lydon, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- American Store Equipment & Construction Corp. v. Jack Dempsey's Punch Bowl, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Shorten v. MilbankNew York Supreme Court · 1939