Legal Opinion
United States v. Justin Mullinax
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2017No. 17-6894UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Justin Mullinax appeals the district court’s order denying his “Sentence Correction Request,” best construed as a 28 U.S.C, § 2241 (2012) petition because Mul-linax sought to challenge the execution of his sentence, See Fontanez v. O’Brien, 807 F.3d 84, 86 (4th Cir. 2015) (explaining that a prisoner generally challenges the execution of a sentence under § 2241), The sentence at issue was imposed in the District of South Carolina, but Mullinax filed his petition while incarcerated in the Middle District of North Carolina,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hendrickson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- David John Miller v. Margaret Hambrick, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and William McCoy U.S. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jeremy Fontanez v. Terry O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
4Cited by13 opinions
- Blakney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Donald Martin, Jr. v. Warden FCI ButnerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
- Gonzalez v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Gonzalez v. PhelpsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Means v. Nanette BarnesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.