Legal Opinion

Cruce v. Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1993No. WD 45571PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Presiding Judge.

Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) appeals from an adverse judgment following a jury verdict in an action brought by Betty Cruce to recover under the fire insurance provisions of two separate policies issued to her by Auto-Owners. Auto-Owners contends that the trial court erred in overruling Auto-Owners’ motion for a new trial because the trial court (1) admitted inadmissible and otherwise irrelevant hearsay into evidence by allowing a witness to testify as to the out-of-court statements of another witness, and (2) permitted a witness to take the stand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FitzgeraldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lappe and Associates, Inc. v. PalmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. LogginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. City of Springfield v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing AdministratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Berg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Carlton L. Porter, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. McKenna v. McKennaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. Fredrick ZongeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API