Legal Opinion

Schulze v. Price

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1948No. 4-8557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal presents only the question, whether the testimony sustains the verdict upon which the judgment was rendered, from which is this appeal.

The Russellville Livestock Sales Company operates a barn where auction sales of livestock are conducted from time to time. Horses and other livestock are brought there for sale. One Kelley took several horses there for sale. "When sold at auction, the animal sold is said to go through the ring, that is, it is sold at public auction. One of Kelley’s horses did not go through the ring, and was not sold at auction, hut was sold at a private sale to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. Drake v. PopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Norvell v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Cox v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API