Pharr v. Pharr
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for Mrs. Hallie S. Pharr insists “that in its'final analysis the real issue is that the evidence does not support the verdict, and for that reason the judgment of the court should be reversed.”
The Code, § 28-201, declares in part that the following acts shall be fraudulent in law: “2. Every conveyance . . made with intention to delay or defraud creditors, and such intentibn known to the party taking. A bona fide transaction oh a valuable consideration, and without notice or ground for reasonable suspicion, shall be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Martin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- McLendon v. Reynolds Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Morris v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Cothran v. ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mercantile National Bank v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Ferguson v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Ferguson v. ATLANTA NEWSPAPERS INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Cale v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- United States v. ReidDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.