Legal Opinion
Hampe v. Butler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 7, 2004No. 03-1438PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
The individual plaintiffs in this case are industrial workers who reside and worked in western Pennsylvania. Each lost his or her job as a result of foreign competition or because his or her job had been moved to another country. As a result, the workers enrolled in re-training programs through the federal Trade Adjustment Assistance Program (“TAA”) of the Trade Act of 1974. Under the Act, the workers were entitled to reimbursement for training-related travel expenses if they had to travel outside their regular commuting area. However, the Pennsylvania Department of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bennett v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Robinson v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cooper v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- 181 South Inc. v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Botman International, B.V. v. International Produce Imports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Burnside v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.