Legal Opinion

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Hamel

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 8, 1999No. 97-P-1404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

The plaintiff, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica), sought a declaration that a comprehensive general liability policy purchased by its insured, Printed Circuit Design, Inc. (PCD), did not cover a $300,000 judgment obtained against PCD by the Polymer Realty Trust (Polymer). In dealing with this case, we revisit the question of the meaning of an “occurrence,” which is defined in the policy as “neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured.”2 A judge of the *623Superior Court, on cross motions for summary judgment, found beyond question that PCD should have anticipated that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Co. v. OneBeacon America InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Gillette Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  3. Creamer v. Arbella Ins. Grp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. United States Fire Insurance Company v. Peterson Oil Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API