Legal Opinion

Katz v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley L. Sklar, J.

The issues presented are (a) whether the plaintiffs may seek to hold a professional corporation (P.C.) vicariously liable for the acts of two non party physician employees when the P.C. was, after expiration of the Statute of Limitations, made a party to this action based solely on its unity of interest with another physician who was an employee and shareholder of the P.C., and who was timely served; and (b) whether that timely served physician may be held vicariously liable for the two nonparty physicians on the basis of de facto employment.

*817Dr. John…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. St. Clare's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API