Legal Opinion

F.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 2014No. 3D13-1590PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

We affirm the lower court’s determination, following an adjudicatory' hearing, that F.T. committed the offense of petit theft of retail merchandise.

F.T. was charged with stealing several items of merchandise from a J.C. Penney store. The total amount of the merchandise allegedly stolen was $100 or more but less than $300, which would constitute first-degree petit theft, a first-degree misdemeanor. See, § 812.014(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2012). At trial, the court permitted the loss prevention officer to testify, over objection, to the price contained on the price tags attached to the merchandise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Lukaj v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2017-04Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. K.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. K.Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API