Legal Opinion

Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 12, 1970No. C.D. 3967Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

Tliese two protests were consolidated for trial. The imported fabric is described in the invoices as follows :

The fabric was sold to plaintiff by Kinsho-Mataichi Co., Ltd. of Osaka, Japan, hereinafter referred to as Kinsho, and was entered at the port of ISTew York.

The collector of customs classified and assessed all of the merchandise under paragraph 1306 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, which reads as follows:

“Woven fabrics in the piece, wholly or in chief value of rayon or other synthetic textile, not specially provided for, whether or not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API