Legal Opinion

Rohstein v. Sheehan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of contract to recover against the drawers of a check dated May 1, 1939, for the sum of $275 payable to Ross Beer Saving System, which was the name under which one Ross, the plaintiff’s son, conducted business. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff excepted to the refusal of the judge to grant his motion for a directed verdict in his favor.

The defendants on or about March 17, 1939, but under the date of March 6, 1939, entered into a written conditional sales contract with Ross for the purchase and installation by Ross of certain equipment in their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Freeman v. United Fruit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Tighe v. SkillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Paika v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Macklin v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. ClicheMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API