Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Darwin

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1980No. 4108Published

1Opinion of the Court

622 P.2d 245 (1980)

95 N.M. 340

George A. RUTHERFORD, Harold V. Larkin and Rancho Village Partners, a New Mexico General Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Tom DARWIN, The Settlement, Ltd., First National Bank in Albuquerque, and John C. Boydston, Defendant-Appellant.

BOMUR TELEPHONE INTERCONNECT COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE A. RUTHERFORD, INC., Third-Party defendant.

No. 4108.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

June 24, 1980.

William A. Sloan, Stanley N. Hatch, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

Susan L. Edwards, Knight & Sullivan, Albuquerque,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Clovis National Bank v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Von Gohren v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Swiss Baco Skyline Logging, Inc. v. HaliewiczCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API