Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peterson v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 6, 2004Published

1DissentMarshall, C.J.

Article 44 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution accords the Legislature “a considerable range of discretion within the bounds of reason” to establish classifications of taxable income. Daley v. State Tax Comm’n, 376 Mass. 861, 866 (1978). See Opinion of the Justices, 425 Mass. 1201, 1203 (1997). Taxpayers challenging such classifications bear the heavy burden of proving “beyond a rational doubt,” Andover Sav. Bank v. Commissioner of Revenue, 387 Mass. 229, 235 (1982), that the General Court’s line drawing is “plainly and grossly oppressive and unequal, or contrary to common…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Snell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. MacLaughlin v. Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API