Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Erickson v. Brown

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2008No. 20070044Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrothers, Justice

[¶59] I concur with that part of the majority opinion remanding the case for consideration of Dregseth’s deceit and equitable claims. I also concur with Parts IV and V of the majority opinion regarding jury instructions and admissibility of evidence. I respectfully dissent from those portions of the majority opinion affirming dismissal of Ramsey’s deceit and equitable claims and affirming dismissal of the action against Capital Harvest.

FRAUD OR DECEIT

[¶ 60] Many of the problems in this case arise because of a legal error that treats fraud and deceit as the same. They are not. Nor are these…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Bank of Kenmare v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dewey v. LetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API