Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Overturf v. University of Utah Medical Center

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1999No. Nos. 960496, 970097Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partZimmerman, Justice

¶ 9 I agree with the majority in its grant • of the motion for summary disposition of the first matter. However, with respect to the second matter I would affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Medical Center.

¶ 10 As the majority acknowledges, only one action may be maintained against a wrongful death defendant. See Switzer v. Reynolds, 606 P.2d 244, 246 (Utah 1980). In my opinion, this one-action rule bars Oxen-dine’s complaint because Frank Overturf, the personal representative of the estate, brought a wrongful death action against the Medical Center for the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Switzer v. ReynoldsUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Parmley v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Tracy v. University of Utah HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Callister v. CallisterUtah Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API