Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Arkansas

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 2012No. 47,317-KAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGaskins, J.

hi concur in the affirmation of the defendant’s convictions and the majority’s holding that the defendant’s sentences are *464not excessive. However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority decision deleting the jail time in lieu of the payment of the fine.

In the present case, although the defendant was represented at the trial court level and on appeal by appointed counsel, on the day trial was to begin, the defendant had retained counsel in court who did not enroll because the trial court refused to grant a continuance to that attorney. Under these circumstances, instead of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. State v. HowardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API