Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pestock

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1990No. 674 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (Department) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County sustaining the driver’s license suspension appeal of Robert S. Pestock.

At the de novo hearing on Pestock’s appeal, the Department introduced the testimony of three Pittsburgh police officers who were involved in Pestock’s arrest and subsequent intoxilizer testing on October 22, 1989. Pestock offered no testimony on his own behalf. The Department’s witnesses described the sequence of events on that date as follows.

Officer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Waigand v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. In Re Apepal From Susupension of Operator's License of BuddCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Polinsky v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Ostrander v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. KilrainCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Pappas v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Mueller v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Horton v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API