Legal Opinion

Thiokol Corporation, Morton International, Inc. (As Successors Through Corporate Reorganization to Morton, Thiokol, Inc.) and Bee Chemical Company v. Douglas B. Roberts, in His Official Capacity as Treasurer of the State of Michigan, and Thomas M. Hoatlin, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Michigan, Akzo America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Akzo Chemicals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Akzo Coatings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Akzo Salt, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Beecham, Inc. (Tn), a Tennessee Corporation, Beloit Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Boc Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Boc Healthcare Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Butler Manufacturing Co., a Delaware Corporation, Coca Cola Company, a Delaware Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Corp., a Georgia Corporation, Hanischfeger Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Jefferson Smurfit Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Kroger Co., an Ohio Corporation, M-I Drilling Fluids Co., a Texas Partnership, May Department Stores Co., a New York Corporation, Miles, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Quaker Chemical Corp., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation, Timken Company, an Ohio Corporation, Upjohn Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and W.R. Grace & Co., a Connecticut Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Revenue Division, Department of Treasury, State of Michigan Douglas B. Roberts, in His Official Capacity as Treasurer of the State of Michigan and Thomas M. Hoatlin, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1996No. 95-1116Published

1Opinion of the Court

76 F.3d 751

64 USLW 2558, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2871,

Pens. Plan Guide P 23918J

THIOKOL CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. (as

successors through corporate reorganization to

Morton, Thiokol, Inc.) and Bee Chemical

Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Douglas B. ROBERTS, in his official capacity as Treasurer of

the State of Michigan, and Thomas M. Hoatlin, in his

official capacity as Commissioner of Revenue of the State of

Michigan, Defendants-Appellees.

AKZO AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Akzo Chemicals,

Inc., a Delaware corporation, Akzo Coatings, Inc., a

Delaware corporation, Akzo Salt,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API