Satanic Temple v. Scottsdale, City of

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 The Satanic Temple, Inc., et al. No. CV-18-00621-PHX-DGC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Scottsdale, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Defendant City of Scottsdale moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims under 17 Rule 12(b)(1), and Plaintiffs move to strike several affirmative defenses. Docs. 62, 63. 18 The motions are fully briefed, and oral argument will not aid the Court’s decision. See 19 Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); LRCiv 7.2(f). The Court will deny the motion to dismiss and grant 20 the motion to strike in part. 21 I.…