PEOPLES FINANCE & THRIFT COMPANY OF OGDEN v. Perry
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TUCKETT, Justice:
The plaintiff initiated these proceedings in the court below seeking to recover the balance due on a promissory note and to foreclose its interest in a security agreement covering a Chevrolet truck. The court awarded judgment on the note but decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to foreclose its interest in the security. The court in effect ruled that the plaintiff had to elect either to take a money judgment or possession of the security. Plaintiff is here seeking a reversal of that part of the court’s decision which denied the plaintiff the right to sell the truck at…
2Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank of Amarillo v. LaJoieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- De La Rosa v. Western Funding, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- PEOPLES FINANCE & THRIFT COMPANY OF OGDEN v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Tucker v. Santander Consumer usaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022