Legal Opinion

SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 2014No. A13-1566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

Appellants-buyers of real estate challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent-bank, arguing that the district court erred by determining that a purported agreement does not satisfy the subscription requirement of the statute of frauds and that the evidence is insufficient for the buyers to invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel to preclude application of the statute of frauds. Because we conclude that no reasonable fact-finder could determine that (1) the buyers and the bank agreed to electronically sign the agreement, (2) the bank…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Cloud Corporation v. Hasbro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Khoury v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Brian Rhodes v. Stockwell Homes, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. MYSTIC RETREAT MED SPA & WEIGHT LOSS CENTER v. ZELTIQ AESTHETICS LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API