Legal Opinion

State v. Bertrand

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1938No. File No. Cr. 149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The information, after stating the time and place of the commission of the alleged offense, charges:

“That at said time and place the said defendant, II. G. Bertrand, being then and there the agent and servant of the Electrolux, Inc., a corporation, did wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and fraudulently, appropriate to his own use and secrete with a fraudulent intent to appropriate to his own use certain personal property which had come into his control and care by virtue of his employment as such agent and servant of said Electrolux, Inc., a corporation, to-wit: that certain Electrolux…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. CrosswhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Dotson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  4. McCrary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Brown v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API