Legal Opinion

In re Fawick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 6, 1932No. 2917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the primary examiner denying, claims 1 to 7, 9 to 19, and 21 to 31, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to improvements in a transmission for automotive vehicles. Claim 8 was allowed. Claim 20 was canceled by appellant.

Claims 2, 9, and 15 are illustrative. They read:

2. In combination, a gear box having a drive shaft, a stationary countershaft entirely at one side of the drive slia/t and a stub shaft, a housing secured on the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of George J. DeanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API