Legal Opinion

Miss. United Methodist Conference v. Brown

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2006No. 2005-M-02092PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

929 So.2d 907 (2006)

MISSISSIPPI UNITED METHODIST CONFERENCE

v.

Telaya BROWN.

No. 2005-M-02092.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 2006.

Joseph E. Lotterhos, Charles F. Barbour, Jackson, attorneys for petitioner.

Steve Mark Wann, Marjorie S. Busching, Jackson, Tara A. Harrison, attorneys for respondent.

EN BANC.

ON PETITION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGE AND FOR STAY

SMITH, Chief Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. This interlocutory appeal stems from a lawsuit filed by Telaya Brown against the Mississippi United Methodist Conference (Conference), which is currently pending before the Hinds County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bredemeier v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Rushing v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Collins v. JoshiMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hathcock v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  2. David Thomas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Whitley v. City of PearlCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  4. David Thomas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. David Thomas v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API