Legal Opinion

McAdoo v. McCartney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1922No. 10813PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This action was brought by Joe McCartney, as plaintiff, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, as defendant, to recover damages in the sum of $100 for the wrongful and negligent killing of a horse, the property of the plaintiff. By stipulation, Wm. G. Mc-Adoo, Director General of Railroads, was made the party defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $75, upon which judgment was rendered, and to review which this proceeding in error was instituted.

The plaintiff in error insists that there was no actionable negligence upon his part,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. RainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Dickinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API