Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Mack

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 2018No. CV-18-270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentHart, J.

I dissent. The only issue before this court is the circuit court's denial of Mack's *847in forma pauperis petition. The circuit court denied Mack's in forma pauperis petition pursuant to Rule 72 based upon its holding that, while Mack is indigent, his petition failed to state a colorable cause of action. This court has held that that habeas will lie where the confinement order is illegal on its face or the court that issued the confinement order was without jurisdiction. Smith v. Hobbs , 2015 Ark. 312, 468 S.W.3d 269. The majority suggests that Mack's claim is limited to an assertion of an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roy Lee Russell v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API