Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1944No. 33,799Published

1DissentJulius J. Olson, Justice

While fully concurring in the dissent of Mr. Justice Magney, I wish to a¡dd a few observations of my own.

This is an action involving contract rights and obligations. Under the terms of the policy, the burden fell upon plaintiff to prove that her husband’s death occurred “as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries, effected solely through external, violent and accidental means,” and that such death did not result “directly or indirectly from bodily or mental infirmity or disease in any form.”

The majority opinion concedes that the testimony of Dr. Stin-nette…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Kundiger v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Turner v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API