Legal Opinion
deBrossard v. Van Norden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The facts are not in dispute. On May 29, 1970, contemporaneously with the execution of a formal separation agreement between them, plaintiff Boyd P. deBrossard and Pauline Cave, then Pauline deBrossard, entered into an agreement, which, insofar as is relevant, provides:
"1. Pauline employs Boyd as a financial advisor and consul*124tant to her and Boyd accepts such employment. Boyd shall, if requested by Pauline, serve as a trustee of a trust of which she is the settlor * * * Boyd, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Collard v. Incorporated Village of Flower HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lacy v. . GetmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wilson Sullivan Co. v. International Paper Makers Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Belgium, S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grimaldi v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Choczner v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Schantz v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Schantz)District Court, N.D. New York · 1998