Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1976No. [No. 22, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in the result and filed a concurring opinion at page 535 infra.

The issue presented for our consideration is whether .the petitioner in this case was denied his rights to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and -by Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. Because we conclude that these rights were violated, the petitioner’s conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

The petitioner, Ramarro Lee Smith, in a seven-count indictment returned by the grand jury in Montgomery County on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. State v. GeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Jolley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API