Legal Opinion

Howe v. Hinzman

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2006No. A-04-683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cassel, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Sharon Dempsey Howe’s negligence claim against Lauri Hinzman, arising from an automobile accident, resulted in a jury verdict finding both parties to have been negligent and reducing Howe’s award for damages accordingly. Howe appeals. Because we conclude that (1) the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to strike a juror who maintained that he could be fair and impartial after disclosing that he had received a message from a legal assistant to Hinzman’s counsel regarding that attorney’s representation of the juror’s daughter in an unrelated case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. LeRette v. American Medical Security, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Schindler v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gustafson v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. KrutilekNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LantzNebraska Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API