Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smakula
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1988No. D.D. 88-6PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This court concurs in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Hayes v. State Medical Board of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Disciplinary Counsel v. NorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MartinezOhio Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.