Legal Opinion
Chumash Hill Properties, Inc. v. Peram
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1995No. B087610PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
Peram, a California limited partnership, appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Chumash Hill Properties, Inc. (Chumash) on Chumash’s complaint against Peram, as well as appealing the court’s dismissal of Peram’s cross-complaint against Chumash. We conclude the trial court properly determined Chumash’s subleasehold survived its sublessor’s rejection of the primary lease in bankruptcy, preventing the landlord Peram from regaining possession of the subleased property.
Peram owns the subject real property consisting of approximately 26 acres in San Luis Obispo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sea Harvest Corp. v. Riviera Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re Elm Inn, Inc., Debtor. Eldon Anderson Shirley Anderson v. Elm Inn, Inc. Continental Savings of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Buttner v. KasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Valsan Partners Limited Partnership v. Calcor Space Facility, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Syufy Enterprises v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Miscione v. Barton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Miscione v. Barton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Syufy Enterprises v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002