Legal Opinion

Hill v. Mayo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

— Mayo sued Hill upon a promissory note •executed by Hill to Mayo & Shalter, and endorsed by Mayo & Shalter to Mayo.

The defendant filed a demurrer to the,complaint, assigning for cause that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, .and judgment given on demurrer for the plaintiff.

In this court the only error assigned in the proceedings of the court below is the overruling of the demurrer. The complaint is in the usual form upon a promissory note, and .alleges that the note and endorsement were filed marked •“Exhibit.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Friddle v. CraneIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Brown v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Reed v. BroadbeltIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Old v. MohlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GliddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Myers v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API