Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1995No. 94-1873Published

1Per curiam

Appellant’s conviction for burglary is reversed. See Lee v. State, 640 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Morse v. State, 604 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); KW.U. v. State, 367 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 349 (Fla.1979); Chaudoin v. State, 362 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant’s conviction for loitering is affirmed. See A.L.B. v. State, 399 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). In view of our reversal of appellant’s burglary conviction, we do not reach the sentencing issue.

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chaudoin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Morse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. A.L.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994