Legal Opinion

Johnson v. North Atlantic & Gulf S. S. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1941No. 77PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The respondents have moved that the Court decline jurisdiction and dismiss this libel in rem against the steamship “Lynghaug.”

The claim is for damages for personal injuries, and for maintenance and cure. Since the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, is not applicable (Plamals v. The Pinar Del Rio, 277 U.S. 151, 48 S.Ct. 457, 72 L.Ed. 827) the count for damages must be grounded upon the general law of maritime tort, and there is an allegation of unseaworthiness of the vessel, which supports that theory of the cause of action.

I am of the opinion that the libel should be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Charter Shipping Co. v. Bowring, Jones & Tidy, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Gerradin v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mobil Tankers Co. v. Mene Grande Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API