Legal Opinion
John Roe 2 v. Ogden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2001No. 00-1302PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
John Roe #2 and the Ralph Timothy Potter Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union at the University of Denver College of Law (collectively, the “Students”) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint. The district court concluded that the Students lacked standing, that their claims were not ripe, and that abstention was appropriate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse. The Students’ action should proceed to the merits, on which we express no opinion.
7. Background
The Students, including John Roe #2, are members of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania D/B/A Department of Corrections Donald T. Vaughn Phico Services Company Compservices, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Yellowbear v. Wyoming Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.