Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Ginsberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1981No. 80-2323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, in 1960, recovered a final judgment covering a number of items, including periodic alimony. The appellee’s continuing duty to make periodic alimony payments ceased in 1965.

In 1980, the appellant sought a continuing writ of garnishment, pursuant to Section 61.12(2), Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court refused to issue a continuing writ of garnishment, and this appeal ensued. We affirm.

There did not appear to be any evidence of a current continuing order to make periodic alimony or support payments in the record before the trial court; to the contrary, the evidence indicated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwarz v. WaddellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Nichols v. SchwarzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Cooper v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API