Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
For the second time in as many years, petitioner, a local utility, seeks review of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order denying it the opportunity to continue purchasing transmission services through a contract that expired at the end of 2004. Finding petitioner’s claims merit-less, we deny the petition.
I
Under a contract signed in 1967, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and several other California utilities provided petitioner, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), long-term firm transmission service. For…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bush-Quayle '92 Primary Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Ohio Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Ohio Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Duncan's Point Lot Owners Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Transmission Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.