City of Waukesha v. Gorz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Gary A. Gorz appeals his conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Gorz criticizes the trial court's ruling that although the officer who stopped him was outside his jurisdiction, the officer made a valid citizen's arrest. He argues that the officer failed to make a valid citizen's arrest for two reasons: First, an officer cannot effect a citizen's arrest by using police indicia. Second, an officer cannot effect a citizen's arrest for a traffic offense such as operating while intoxicated. We disagree and affirm.
A town of Brookfield police officer was transporting two persons to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- State v. CaibaiosaiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- McEathron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. FurrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.