Legal Opinion

Erickson Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The claimant in this unemployment compensation case was denied benefits by the bureau, referee, and the board because his unemployment was due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. See Unemployment Compensation Law, §402(b) (1), as amended, 43 PS §802(b) (1).

On Friday, September 14, 1962, the claimant, a carpenter layout man, attempted to secure an increase in his hourly wage rate from $2.60 to $3.00 by threatening to quit if it was not granted. The employer failed to agree to the increase. When the claimant did not report to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. McGuire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Keisling Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfafman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Meany v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API