Legal Opinion

United States v. Flower

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1939No. 11435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEWEY, District Judge.

This suit was brought by the United States on behalf of the Winnebago Tribe of Indians to recover certain lands which lie in the Missouri River bottom. It was claimed that about 4000 acres were accretions to lands which had been allotted to the Indian Tribe.

The suit was brought in equity but as the plaintiff did not have possession and the defendants were in possession under claim of right adverse to the plaintiff, the court directed the case to be docketed as a law action. It was tried on the law side; a jury having been waived. After issues joined, extensive evidence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. Atlas Beverage Co. v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981
  4. Jeffrey v. GrosvenorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Jacquelyn K. Greiner, by Her Next Friend, John Greiner v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API