Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilmore v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 24, 1968Published

1DissentHofstadter, J.

Plaintiff retired in March of 1962. In April of 1967, she instituted this action to recover the cash equivalent of compensatory time off due her at .the time of retirement, based on a Joint Administrative Order (No. 11) of the Appellate Divisions for the First and Second Departments dated October 29, 1965, which decided that one Donald Dawson should be credited with compensatory time off for time worked on weekends and holidays between 1960 and 1962. But there .are two fundamental differences between plaintiff’s case and that of Mr. Dawson. Mr. Dawson was still in city employ — Miss Gilmore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Crane v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Wadsworth v. . Bd. of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Willett v. DevoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API