Legal Opinion · Dissent

Corson v. Hames

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 1977No. 53018Published

1DissentBell, Chief Judge

1. The Supreme Court, in Brooks v. State, 238 Ga. 435, held that Powell v. Allen, 140 Ga. App. 186 (230 SE2d 343) would not be followed. Consequently, its correctness is no longer an issue.

2. Assuming but not deciding that appellant was ordered to testify under a grant of use and derivative use immunity, the purported grant was defective. Paragraph 7 of the immunity document prepared by the district attorney and approved by the court provided in part: "In the event the testimony of Amy Ruth Corson is not full, or complete or truthful in every particular then this grant of immunity by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Powell v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API