Legal Opinion

Deeble v. Exchange National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1916No. Civ. No. 1804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

A demurrer in which special and general grounds were assigned was sustained to the third amended complaint of the plaintiff without leave to amend, and judgment of dismissal followed, from which this appeal was taken. It is recited in that judgment that plaintiff’s attorneys stated to the court that they did not desire to further amend, and no question is made as to that part of the order which denied leave to amend the pleading. The question argued is as to whether the complaint contained a statement of facts suffi cient to constitute a cause of action against defendant. It was first therein…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  2. Ross v. First National Trust and Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. SF 2402 LLC v. B.F.B., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
  4. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API