Weiner v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
As the temporary order of protection at issue in this case has been vacated, any determination by this Court will not directly affect the rights of the parties (see Festa v Festa, 76 AD3d 1047, *9541047-1048 [2010]; Matter of Bucaro v Morales, 62 AD3d 994, 995 [2009]). Since the matter does not warrant the invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]), the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Bucaro v Morales, 62 AD3d at 995). Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bucaro v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of LukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Richmond County District Attorney v. Staten Island Universal HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Richmond County District Attorney v. Staten Island Universal HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013