Legal Opinion
Glisson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 5, 1967No. 3 Div. 281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
As pointed out in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals on rehearing, since the Penal Code of 1866, Section 260, it has been the established policy of this state that terms of sentences are to run consecutively, and not concurrently.
As observed in State ex rel. McQueen v. Horton, 31 Ala.App. 71, 14 So.2d 557:
“It is definitely the policy, and provision, of our law that two (or more) terms of imprisonment in the penitentiary imposed upon a convict for separate convictions shall be served consecutively, not concurrently. Code 1940, Title 45, Sec. 32. This could only mean…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McQueen v. HortonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Chaney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
- Isbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Eldridge v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984