Legal Opinion
Shoals v. Home Depot, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 17, 2006No. 105CV011850WWSMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S PRAYER FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (DOC. 18), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TRIAL BY JURY (DOC. 16).
WANGER, District Judge..
I. INTRODUCTION
This lawsuit concerns an oral home improvement contract allegedly entered into by Plaintiff Sir Lee Sehoals and Daniel Rule, 1 a former employee of Defendant Home Depot, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Home Depot”). Before the court for decision are (1) Defendant’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, in which Home Depot seeks dismissal of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Jerry J. Enomoto, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wave House Belmont Park, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2007