State v. Kisch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This is a sentencing appeal in which the defendant contends that an upward dura-tional departure was unjustified. We affirm.
Defendant, who was 17 at the time of the offense, was certified for prosecution as an adult after his indictment by a grand jury on three counts of murder in the beating death of a 12-year-old runaway boy. Specifically, defendant was charged with first-degree premeditated murder, second-degree intentional murder, and second-degree felony murder. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to an amended charge that he aided and abetted others, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MitjansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. EslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.