Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Morrell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 2, 2006No. S06A1240Published

1ConcurrenceCarley, Justice

In footnote 1 of its opinion, the majority states that “[ajlthough Morrell has died while this appeal was pending, the case is not moot, as the issue involved is capable of repetition yet evading review. [Cits.]” However, the majority does not further explain its conclusion that this case is not moot. I agree that this appeal has not been mooted by Morrell’s death, and write separately to set forth in more detail the reason why.

As a general rule, the death of a criminal defendant during the pendency of his appeal renders the case moot. Dorsey v. State, 272 Ga. 283 (528 SE2d 257) (2000).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. Lombard Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Chastain v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Titelman v. StedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. City of Atlanta v. McCarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API